NEEDS FIX
12 descriptive-legal claim(s) flagged for optional human review (advisory): ['c-013', 'c-014', 'c-015', 'c-016', 'c-017', 'c-019', 'c-020', 'c-021', 'c-022', 'c-023', 'c-024', 'c-025']; citation gate(s) flagged: ['C-4 concentration <=35%', 'C-6 tier mix (>=3 in T1-3, >=2 T4)']; 8 of 25 claim(s) carry no verdict: the deterministic checker settles legal claims only and the semantic verifiers were not run. Each is bound byte-exact to a frozen source at S4, which is why the article renders, but byte-exactness is not a semantic verdict
source: showcase-run-receipt.json · legal check: PASS · 2524 rendered words (draft body 2253w)
1. The published article
This is the exact article.html the pipeline produced — the 29-element page that would go live on the blog (brand styling, table of contents, Key Takeaways, the compliance notice before the body, FAQ, numbered Sources, and the machine-readable Article + FAQ data). Publishing is paused; nothing was sent anywhere.
embedded file: article.html · open full page
2. The journey
Every article moves through the same numbered stages. Each move is recorded in the article's manifest.yaml with who did it and when — the article cannot skip a gate.
| Move | By | When (UTC) | What happened |
|---|
| (created) → 01-queued | orchestrator | 2026-08-13T13:01:12 | |
| 01-queued → 02-briefing | brief-agent | 2026-08-14T11:00:02 | 3.1-3.11 outline built and frozen |
| 02-briefing → 03-drafting | writer-agent | 2026-08-14T11:03:32 | stage S4 |
source: manifest.yaml
3. QA Gate 1 — the outline, before a word was written
Before drafting, five independent checks run on the outline. This is where the system refuses to build on an unsupported claim. Each check reports how many items it looked at, how many failed, and out of how many (checked / failed / denominator).
Attempt 1 PASS · 2026-08-14T11:00:02| Check | Result | checked/failed/denom | Detail |
|---|
| product-accuracy | PASS | 25/0/25 | tier T1b: 0 product-class claim(s) among 25 declared; 0 SSOT records frozen and available as the enum |
| legal-frame-and-position | PASS | 30/0/30 | 25 claim frames + 5 triggered elements; ordering sub-check not applicable: outline plans 0 legal and 0 commercial section(s); an ordering constraint n |
| citation-entails-claim | PASS | 25/0/25 | 25 of 25 planned claims carry an assigned frozen source; 0 declared without one; 0 P3 claim(s) resolved INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE and are REMOVED from the |
| competitor | PASS | 25/0/25 | 25 source/link origins resolved against 10 blocked competitor domains and 4 recognised market-context domains |
| structure-and-link-liveness | PASS | 14/0/14 | 9 sections + 5 required elements; link-liveness sub-check not applicable: the outline plans zero outbound links (predicate `planned_links is non-empty |
source: outline-qa-log.json
4. QA Gate 2 — the finished draft
After the full article is written, five verifiers re-check the finished draft — product accuracy, legal accuracy, citations, competitor safety, and structure — and an adjudicator decides the outcome. In this zero-cost run the legal and citation checks are deterministic (exact-match against the sources), which is stronger than an AI opinion and needs no paid API.
| Verifier | Result | checked/failed/denom | Detail | From |
|---|
| product | PASS | 25/0/25 | tier T1a: 0 product-class claim(s) of 25 declared; product claims resolve to catalog/ssot/ssot.json | claims.json |
| legal | PASS | 9/0/13 | deterministic pool match: 1 SUPPORTED, 0 CONTRADICTED, 8 INSUFFICIENT, 4 HUMAN_REVIEW | legal-verify-receipt.json |
| citation | FAIL | 11/2/11 | 9/11 citation gates PASS; 8 sources / 25 placements / reuse 3.125 | render-receipt.json |
| competitor | PASS | 9/0/9 | 8 cited source host(s) + body scanned against 10 blocked competitor domain(s); hits=none | draft.md + competitor-allowlist.json |
| structure | PASS | 25/18/25 | 7/25 structural elements present; 2524 rendered words vs 2500 floor (delivery-gate measure; draft body 2253w) | render-receipt.json + article.html (delivery-gate word count) |
Adjudicator: NEEDS-FIX — 12 descriptive-legal claim(s) flagged for optional human review (advisory): ['c-013', 'c-014', 'c-015', 'c-016', 'c-017', 'c-019', 'c-020', 'c-021', 'c-022', 'c-023', 'c-024', 'c-025']; citation gate(s) flagged: ['C-4 concentration <=35%', 'C-6 tier mix (>=3 in T1-3, >=2 T4)']; 8 of 25 claim(s) carry no verdict: the deterministic checker settles legal claims only and the semantic verifiers were not run. Each is bound byte-exact to a frozen source at S4, which is why the article renders, but byte-exactness is not a semantic verdict
word floor: 2524 rendered words (delivery-gate measure; draft body 2253w) vs 2500 · source: stage-report-S5-S7.json + editorial-review.json
5. Claim-accuracy table — every claim, traced
This is the heart of the proof. Every checkable claim in the article is listed with: the single-source-of-truth it draws on (LEGAL-SSOT = the legal folder, PRODUCT-SSOT = the product catalogue, OEM-TECHNICAL = manufacturer spec sheets), the source's own words (“before”), the verdict, and how it was checked. “After” — our paraphrase — is the claim text itself in column 2.
| Claim / verdict | Our text (after) | Value | Single source of truth | Source's own words (before) | Method |
|---|
c-001 — | When the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) is 40% full of particulate matter, the vehicle will look for opportunities to automatically enter regeneration mode, without alerting the d | 40% | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-002 — | However, under conditions of exclusive short duration and low speed driving cycles, your Cummins® diesel engine and exhaust after-treatment system may never reach the conditions re | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-003 — | **At 70%, the truck asks for highway speed.** If the filter has not managed to clear itself, the message arrives: reaches 70% full, the message "Exhaust Filter Nearing Full Sa | 70% | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-004 — | **At 70% with the truck moving, regeneration is announced.** If the DPF reaches 70% full, this message will display with a chime when the regeneration mode is automatically engaged | 70% | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-005 — | Once that starts, the truck keeps reminding you until the job is finished: This will repeat every three minutes while the DPF is self-cleaning, until the particulate level is reduc | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-006 — | The manual states the relationship first — The fuller the DPF is, the longer the regeneration process will take to complete. — and then puts a number on the heavily loaded case: if | 90% | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-007 — | The manual states the relationship first — The fuller the DPF is, the longer the regeneration process will take to complete. — and then puts a number on the heavily loaded case: if | 90% | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-008 — | **At 100%, driving no longer helps.** This is the threshold that turns a duty-cycle problem into a repair bill: This message displays if the DPF reaches 100% full. | 100% | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-009 — | At that point the truck reduces power and the remedy leaves the owner's hands: regeneration is no longer possible and the vehicle should be taken to an authorized dealer | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-010 — | And the filter itself is not necessarily the end of the cost: In extreme cases, a completely full DPF can damage the exhaust system, requiring part replacements. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-011 — | The truck uses an exhaust after-treatment system to reduce emissions utilizing a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) and a Selective Reduction Catalyst (SCR). | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-012 — | On equipped Chassis Cabs, a manual regeneration can be enable through the instrument cluster. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-36 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-013 INSUFFICIENT | Section 203(a)(3)(A) prohibits tampering with emissions controls, including those controls that are in the engine (e.g., fuel injection, exhaust gas recirculation), and those contr | 203 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-18 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-014 HUMAN REVIEW | Section 203(a)(3)(B) prohibits aftermarket defeat devices. | 203 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-18 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-015 HUMAN REVIEW | EPA has also given the specific example: computer software that alters diesel fuel injection timing is a defeat device. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-23 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-016 INSUFFICIENT | And the prohibition reaches everyone in the chain rather than only the owner: The CAA prohibits tampering with emissions controls, as well as manufacturing, selling, and installing | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-16 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-017 HUMAN REVIEW | EPA addresses the conversion argument directly: The Clean Air Act does not contemplate removing emissions controls from an EPA-certified motor vehicle in order to convert it into a | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-19 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-018 SUPPORTED | Tampering, including installation of a defeat device, can void manufacturer warranties. | — | LEGAL-SSOT lg-src-178 | “42 U.S.C. § 7541 (Clean Air Act §207), 'Compliance by vehicles and engines in actual use', establishes the federal emission warranty: the manufacturer” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-019 INSUFFICIENT | EPA's other statement of it adds the causation element, which is the part worth knowing: Tampering can void manufacturer warranties and insurance agreements if the tampering c | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-17 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-020 INSUFFICIENT | On duration, the answer is not the one most owners expect: prohibitions on tampering and defeat devices apply for the entire life of vehicles, engines, and equipment. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-18 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-021 INSUFFICIENT | EPA lists a California Executive Order as one of the recognised ways to hold a reasonable basis: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued an Executive Order (EO) that c | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-19 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-022 INSUFFICIENT | For any person other than a manufacturer or dealer the figure is a maximum of $5,911 per motor vehicle or engine, described in the controlling authority as maximum, per motor vehic | $5,911 | LEGAL-SSOT (folder) s-authorities | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-023 INSUFFICIENT | For a manufacturer or dealer the figure is an order of magnitude higher, at a maximum of $59,114 per motor vehicle or engine, being the maximum, per motor vehicle or engine, for a | $59,114 | LEGAL-SSOT (folder) s-authorities | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-024 INSUFFICIENT | Both are ceilings rather than tariffs, and the statute directs how the actual number is arrived at: These are MAXIMA, not fixed amounts. §7524(b)-(c)(2) require the assessor to wei | 7524 | LEGAL-SSOT (folder) s-authorities | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-025 HUMAN REVIEW | It is closed to this one by the terms on which such orders are granted: The Executive Officer shall deny the applicant's exemption request if the device will reduce the effect | — | LEGAL-SSOT (folder) s-authorities | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
source: claims.json (+ legal-verify-receipt.json for legal verdicts)
6. Citation provenance — the paper trail
Each numbered reference in the article traces back to a single source of truth and, from there, to the underlying .gov statute or manufacturer page. A source is linked once and reused by number thereafter (the hyperlink-once rule).
13
Legal claims → legal SSOT
0
Product claims → product SSOT
12
Technical claims → OEM specs
8
Distinct sources (2 legal / 6 OEM/KB / 0 product)
source: render-receipt.json + claims.json by_type
7. Waivers — what the engine refused to invent
When a required part of an article has no source behind it, the engine does not write it anyway. It records a waiver: the element, the reason, and exactly which sources were checked and found empty. This is the rule that would have prevented the August 2026 incident — an element with nothing behind it is declared missing, never filled in with something plausible. Below is every waiver on this article, so the gap is a decision you can see and overrule rather than a silence you would have to notice.
Element 3 — Key Takeawaysno key_takeaways in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:key_takeawaysmetadata.json:keyTakeaways
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 4 — Introductionno intro in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 20 — Vehicle compatibility tableno product on this article carries a fitment record in the catalogue
Sources checked and found empty:
catalogue:products[].fitment
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 22 — Technical specs tableno product on this article carries variant records in the catalogue
Sources checked and found empty:
catalogue:products[].variants
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 8 — Expert quoteno claim on this article is declared as a quote, and the profile's technical-sources pool is a domain allowlist that carries no quotations, so no sourceable attributed quote exists
Sources checked and found empty:
<article>/claims.json:type=quote<article>/claims.json:evidence.kind=quoteprofiles/<client>/technical-sources.json
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 9 — FAQno faq in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 16 — The Bottom Lineno bottom_line in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:bottom_line
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 24 — Internal link blockno internal_links in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:internal_links
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 27 — Named author biono author_bio/credentials in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 25 — Entity optimization blockno product entities on this article and no publisher entity to state
Sources checked and found empty:
profile.yaml:display_name<article>/callouts.json
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 26 — Owned data / customer review blockno product referenced by this article carries a review aggregate in the catalogue, and there is no review text anywhere in it to quote
Sources checked and found empty:
catalogue:products[].reviews.ratingcatalogue:products[].reviews.count
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 11 — AI block (GEO)the block reuses the Key Takeaways bullets and none exist (element 3 is itself waived)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:key_takeawaysmetadata.json:keyTakeaways
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 23 — Visible update datemetadata carries no date_modified, and the render clock is not a substitute for a recorded edit date
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:date_modified
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
source: waivers.json · cross-checked against the 13 waiver notice(s) rendered in article.html
8. Copied word-for-word? — overlap with the sources
A paraphrase is supposed to differ from its source — that is what makes it a paraphrase. This measures the opposite: how many of the article's words sit inside a run of 8 or more consecutive words that also appears, exactly, in one of the frozen sources the writer worked from. This is shown, never enforced. It cannot block or delay anything, because some overlap is correct — legal wording has to track the statute closely, and a model name or a torque figure has one right spelling. Read a high number as "go and look", not as "this is wrong".
30.2%
Words inside a copied run
35
Longest copied run (words)
HIGH — worth a read-through · flag threshold 30%, a review trigger rather than a limit — nothing is blocked at any value
The longest copied runs, and where each came from:
| Length | Source | The copied words |
|---|
| 35w | oem-36, oem-37 | “On equipped Chassis Cabs, a manual regeneration can be enable through the instrument cluster. The manual regeneration will allow the DPF to complete a regeneration, lowering the soot level w” |
| 33w | oem-36, oem-37 | “However, under conditions of exclusive short duration and low speed driving cycles, your Cummins® diesel engine and exhaust after-treatment system may never reach the conditions required to ” |
| 33w | oem-18 | “Section 203(a)(3)(A) prohibits tampering with emissions controls, including those controls that are in the engine (e.g., fuel injection, exhaust gas recirculation), and those controls that a” |
| 32w | oem-19 | “The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued an Executive Order (EO) that covers the same
device or part on the same model vehicle on which the device or part was installed.” |
| 31w | oem-36, oem-37 | “When the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) is 40% full of particulate matter, the vehicle will look for opportunities to automatically enter regeneration mode, without alerting the driver or r” |
| 30w | oem-36, oem-37 | “If the DPF reaches 70% full, this message will display with a chime when the regeneration mode is automatically engaged while the vehicle is being driven at a suitable speed.” |
| 30w | oem-18 | “prohibitions on tampering and defeat devices apply for the entire life of vehicles, engines, and equipment. They apply regardless of whether the regulatory "useful life" or warrant” |
| 27w | oem-36, oem-37 | “reaches 70% full, the message "Exhaust Filter Nearing Full Safely Drive at Highway Speeds to Clear" will display at key-on and when the vehicle is in PARK.” |
| 24w | oem-19 | “The Clean Air Act does not contemplate removing emissions controls from an EPA-certified motor
vehicle in order to convert it into a competition vehicle.” |
| 22w | oem-36, oem-37 | “if the DPF reaches 90%full, complete regeneration will typically require 45 minutes of driving to restore the system to normal operating condition.” |
| 22w | s-authorities | “The Executive Officer shall deny the applicant's exemption request if the device will reduce the effectiveness of the emissions control system.” |
| 21w | oem-16 | “The CAA prohibits tampering with emissions controls, as well as manufacturing, selling, and installing aftermarket devices intended to defeat those controls.” |
Words copied, by source:
| Source | Words |
|---|
oem-36 | 269 words |
oem-37 | 269 words |
s-authorities | 136 words |
oem-18 | 83 words |
oem-19 | 75 words |
s-legal-gate | 72 words |
oem-16 | 21 words |
oem-17 | 20 words |
s-usa-regs | 18 words |
oem-23 | 13 words |
Read the draft with the copied runs highlighted — every highlight names the source it matches
# DPF Delete Software: What Regeneration Actually Does, and Where the Law Sits
A large share of the trucks whose owners start looking for DPF delete software are not broken. They are part way through a process the owner's manual documents in detail, and which needs something the truck has not been given: sustained driving.
That is worth working through before anything else, because the fix for an incomplete regeneration cycle and the fix for a failed filter are different, and only one of them is a maintenance problem. This article covers what the particulate filter actually does on a Ram Cummins, then where delete software sits in federal law. It is a technical and legal reference rather than legal advice.
## Regeneration is automatic, and it starts earlier than most owners think
The first thing to know is that the truck cleans the filter by itself, well before any message appears.
When the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) is 40% full of particulate matter, the vehicle will look for opportunities to automatically enter regeneration mode, without alerting the driver or requiring any action.oem-36, oem-37
Read the end of that sentence carefully. At 40% the process is already running as conditions allow, with no message, no light, and nothing for the driver to do. Most owners never see this stage and have no reason to.
## The four thresholds
What follows is an escalation, and each step has a published trigger.
**At 70%, the truck asks for highway speed.**
If the filter has not managed to clear itself, the message arrives: reaches 70% full, the message "Exhaust Filter Nearing Full Safely Drive at Highway Speeds to Clear" will display at key-on and when the vehicle is in PARK.oem-36, oem-37
**At 70% with the truck moving, regeneration is announced.**
If the DPF reaches 70% full, this message will display with a chime when the regeneration mode is automatically engaged while the vehicle is being driven at a suitable speed.oem-36, oem-37
Once that starts, the truck keeps reminding you until the job is finished: This will repeat every three minutes while the DPF is self-cleaning, until the particulate level is reduced to zero.oem-36, oem-37
**At 90%, it needs three quarters of an hour.**
The time required is not fixed, and it scales with how loaded the filter is. The manual states the relationship first — The fuller the DPF is, the longer the regeneration process will take to complete.oem-36, oem-37 — and then puts a number on the heavily loaded case: if the DPF reaches 90%full, complete regeneration will typically require 45 minutes of driving to restore the system to normal operating condition.oem-36, oem-37
Forty-five minutes of driving. Not forty-five minutes of idling in a yard, and not three fifteen-minute trips.
**At 100%, driving no longer helps.**
This is the threshold that turns a duty-cycle problem into a repair bill: This message displays if the DPF reaches 100% full.oem-36, oem-37
At that point the truck reduces power and the remedy leaves the owner's hands: regeneration is no longer possible and the vehicle should be taken to an authorized dealeroem-36, oem-37
And the filter itself is not necessarily the end of the cost: In extreme cases, a completely full DPF can damage the exhaust system, requiring part replacements.oem-36, oem-37
## Why short trips are the actual fault
Here is the sentence that explains most of these cases, and it is in the manual rather than on a forum.
However, under conditions of exclusive short duration and low speed driving cycles, your Cummins® diesel engine and exhaust after-treatment system may never reach the conditions required to remove the trapped Particulate Matter (PM).oem-36, oem-37
"May never reach the conditions required" is a description of a duty cycle, not of a defect. A truck used for short low-speed journeys can accumulate soot faster than it gets the opportunity to burn it off, and the filter climbs through the thresholds above while every component works exactly as designed.
That is a genuinely fixable situation, and what fixes it is a periodic long run at road speed. A truck that gets one regularly tends never to see the 70% message at all.
There is also a version of the truck that can do it standing still. On equipped Chassis Cabs, a manual regeneration can be enable through the instrument cluster. The manual regeneration will allow the DPF to complete a regeneration, lowering the soot level without having to drive the vehicle.oem-36, oem-37
## What the filter is part of
One more piece of context matters for the legal half, because the filter is not a standalone component.
The truck uses an exhaust after-treatment system to reduce emissions utilizing a Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) and a Selective Reduction Catalyst (SCR).oem-36, oem-37
A filter and a catalyst, working as one system. That is the object the law is written about.
## Where delete software sits in federal law
Two separate prohibitions apply here, and delete software manages to sit inside both.
The first covers the hardware being deleted. Section 203(a)(3)(A) prohibits tampering with emissions controls, including those controls that are in the engine (e.g., fuel injection, exhaust gas recirculation), and those controls that are in the exhaust (e.g., filters and catalysts).oem-18
The exhaust filter is named. There is no reading of that list under which a particulate filter is outside it.
The second covers the software. Section 203(a)(3)(B) prohibits aftermarket defeat devices. This includes hardware
(e.g., modified exhaust pipes) and software (e.g., engine tuners and tunes).oem-18
So software is inside the statute by name, not by analogy. EPA has also given the specific example: computer software that alters diesel fuel injection timing is a defeat device.oem-23
And the prohibition reaches everyone in the chain rather than only the owner: The CAA prohibits tampering with emissions controls, as well as manufacturing, selling, and installing aftermarket devices intended to defeat those controls.oem-16
Making, selling, installing, tampering. A shop that flashes the tune and a vendor that sells it are inside the same provision as the truck's owner.
## The off-road label
Software in this category is almost always sold with an off-road or competition-only designation, and that designation is not a legal exemption for a truck that is registered and driven on public roads.
EPA addresses the conversion argument directly: The Clean Air Act does not contemplate removing emissions controls from an EPA-certified motor
vehicle in order to convert it into a competition vehicle.oem-19
There is no mechanism in the Act by which a certified highway truck becomes something else because parts came off it or because a calibration was changed. The label states what a seller intends by it.
## Warranty
The consequence most owners meet first is contractual rather than regulatory.
Tampering, including installation of a defeat device, can void manufacturer warranties.oem-19
EPA's other statement of it adds the causation element, which is the part worth knowing: Tampering can void manufacturer warranties and insurance agreements if the tampering can be shown to have caused the failure.
Sooem-17 a modification in the after-treatment system's history is grounds to deny a later claim in that system, and whether it succeeds turns on the causal link. On duration, the answer is not the one most owners expect: prohibitions on tampering and defeat devices apply for the entire life of vehicles, engines, and equipment. They apply regardless of whether the regulatory "useful life" or warranty period has ended.oem-18
A truck out of warranty is outside the manufacturer's obligation, and still inside the statute.
## What the exposure is
Civil penalties for these violations are set by statute at 42 U.S.C. § 7524 and published in current form at 40 C.F.R. § 19.4, which adjusts them for inflation. Two amounts apply to two different classes of party, and the distinction between them is the detail most often reported the wrong way round.
For any person other than a manufacturer or dealer thes-authorities, s-legal-gate figure is a maximum of $5,911 per motor vehicle or engine, described in the controlling authority as maximum, per motor vehicle or engine, for any person OTHER THAN a manufacturer or dealer unders-authorities, s-legal-gate §7522(a)(3)(A); and for any person under §7522(a)(3)(B) per part or component
For a manufacturer or dealer the figure is an order of magnitude higher, at a maximum of $59,114 per motor vehicle or engine, being the maximum, per motor vehicle or engine, for a MANUFACTURER OR DEALER unders-authorities, s-legal-gate §7522(a)(3)(A)
Both are ceilings rather than tariffs, and the statute directs how the actual number is arrived at: These are MAXIMA, not fixed amounts. §7524(b)-(c)(2) require the assessor to weigh gravity, economic benefit, business size and compliance history.s-authorities
Note also which measure attaches to software: the per-part-or-component measure under § 7522(a)(3)(B) carries the individual amount for any person, including a dealer.
## The CARB Executive Order route, and why a delete cannot take it
There is a legitimate documented route by which an aftermarket part avoids enforcement, and it is worth knowing precisely because delete software cannot use it.
EPA lists a California Executive Order as one of the recognised ways to hold a reasonable basis: The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has issued an Executive Order (EO) that covers the same
device or part on the same model vehicle on which the device or part was installed.oem-19
That is a real path for a real category of parts. It is closed to this one by the terms on which such orders are granted: The Executive Officer shall deny the applicant's exemption request if the device will reduce the effectiveness of the emissions control system.s-authorities
A part whose function is to reduce the effectiveness of an emissions control cannot satisfy the test for the order that would exempt it. The category is excluded by definition rather than merely unapproved so far.
## The honest summary
If your truck is showing filter-full messages, the first question is duty cycle, because the manual describes a cycle that automatic regeneration cannot complete on short low-speed journeys, and a sustained run is the documented remedy. That covers a great many of the trucks that arrive at this question.
For the trucks it does not cover: the particulate filter is named in the statute as an emissions control, the software is named as a defeat device, the prohibition reaches the seller and the installer alongside the owner, it lasts the life of the vehicle, and the off-road designation does not move any of it.
---
## Legal notice
This article is educational and describes federal requirements as published by the EPA and the Code of Federal Regulations, alongside vehicle behaviour as published in Ram owner documentation. It is not legal advice.
Removing, disabling, bypassing or defeating an emissions control device on a vehicle certified for highway use is prohibited under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7522(a)(3), and 40 C.F.R. § 1068.101(b). A diesel particulate filter is such a control, and calibration software that alters an emissions control element falls within § 7522(a)(3)(B) as an aftermarket defeat device. Civil penalties under 42 U.S.C. § 7524, as adjusted by 40 C.F.R. § 19.4 for violations assessed on or after 8 January 2025,s-legal-gate reach a maximum of $5,911 per motor vehicle or engine for any person other than a manufacturer or dealers-authorities, s-legal-gate — and per part or component for any person, including a dealer, under § 7522(a)(3)(B) — and a maximum of $59,114 per motor vehicle or engine for a manufacturer or dealer.s-authorities, s-legal-gate These are maxima rather than fixed amounts, and 42 U.S.C. § 7524(b)–(c)(2) requires the assessor to weigh gravity, economic benefit, business size and compliance history.s-authorities These prohibitions apply for the entire life of the vehicle, regardless of whether the warranty or regulatory useful-life period has ended. A part or calibration labelled for off-road, competition or closed-course use is not a legal exemption for a vehicle that is registered or operated on public roads. A California Air Resources Board Executive Order cannot be issued for a device that reduces the effectiveness of an emissions control system.
## Sources
1. 2026 Ram 2500/3500 Owner's Manual — Mopar vehicle information (Stellantis North America)
2. EPA, Enforcement Policy on Vehicle and Engine Tamperingoem-19, s-usa-regs — https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/documents/epatamperingpolicy-enforcementpolicyonvehicleandenginetampering.pdf
3. EPA, Tampering and Defeat Devices enforcement alert — https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/documents/tamperinganddefeatdevices-enfalert.pdf
4. EPA, National Enforcement and Compliance Initiative: Stopping Aftermarket Defeat Devicess-authorities, s-usa-regs — https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-enforcement-and-compliance-initiative-stopping-aftermarket-defeat-devices
5. EPA, Tampering and Aftermarket Defeat Devices (MCDI presentation) — https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-05/documents/tampering-aftermarket-defeat-devices-2019-mcdi-mtg-33pp.pdf
6. EPA, Air Enforcement — https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/air-enforcement
7. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 40 C.F.R. § 19.4 — https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-19/section-19.4
8. EPA final rule, Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment,s-authorities 90 FR 1375 (8 January 2025) — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-01-08/pdf/2025-00206.pdf
9. CARB, Procedures for Exemption of Add-On and Modified Partss-authorities — https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/board/15day/ampts/proceduresfinal.pdf
source: lib/overlap over draft.md vs frozen/sources/*.txt · measured on the authored draft, not the rendered page, so the legal notices and catalogue product text — which are verbatim by design — cannot inflate it
9. Verdict
NEEDS FIX
12 descriptive-legal claim(s) flagged for optional human review (advisory): ['c-013', 'c-014', 'c-015', 'c-016', 'c-017', 'c-019', 'c-020', 'c-021', 'c-022', 'c-023', 'c-024', 'c-025']; citation gate(s) flagged: ['C-4 concentration <=35%', 'C-6 tier mix (>=3 in T1-3, >=2 T4)']; 8 of 25 claim(s) carry no verdict: the deterministic checker settles legal claims only and the semantic verifiers were not run. Each is bound byte-exact to a frozen source at S4, which is why the article renders, but byte-exactness is not a semantic verdict
source: showcase-run-receipt.json · legal check: PASS · 2524 rendered words (draft body 2253w)