NEEDS FIX
3 descriptive-legal claim(s) flagged for optional human review (advisory): ['c-022', 'c-023', 'c-024']; 2484 rendered words below the 2500-word floor — needs a short sourced expansion; citation gate(s) flagged: ['C-4 concentration <=35%', 'C-6 tier mix (>=3 in T1-3, >=2 T4)']; 2 of 24 claim(s) carry no verdict: the deterministic checker settles legal claims only and the semantic verifiers were not run. Each is bound byte-exact to a frozen source at S4, which is why the article renders, but byte-exactness is not a semantic verdict
source: showcase-run-receipt.json · legal check: PASS · 2484 rendered words (draft body 2173w)
1. The published article
This is the exact article.html the pipeline produced — the 29-element page that would go live on the blog (brand styling, table of contents, Key Takeaways, the compliance notice before the body, FAQ, numbered Sources, and the machine-readable Article + FAQ data). Publishing is paused; nothing was sent anywhere.
embedded file: article.html · open full page
2. The journey
Every article moves through the same numbered stages. Each move is recorded in the article's manifest.yaml with who did it and when — the article cannot skip a gate.
| Move | By | When (UTC) | What happened |
|---|
| (created) → 01-queued | orchestrator | 2026-08-13T13:01:08 | |
| 01-queued → 02-briefing | brief-agent | 2026-08-14T11:14:15 | 3.1-3.11 outline built and frozen |
| 02-briefing → 03-drafting | writer-agent | 2026-08-14T11:18:37 | stage S4 |
source: manifest.yaml
3. QA Gate 1 — the outline, before a word was written
Before drafting, five independent checks run on the outline. This is where the system refuses to build on an unsupported claim. Each check reports how many items it looked at, how many failed, and out of how many (checked / failed / denominator).
Attempt 1 PASS · 2026-08-14T11:14:15| Check | Result | checked/failed/denom | Detail |
|---|
| product-accuracy | PASS | 24/0/24 | tier T1a: 0 product-class claim(s) among 24 declared; 0 SSOT records frozen and available as the enum |
| legal-frame-and-position | PASS | 25/0/25 | 24 claim frames + 1 triggered elements; ordering sub-check not applicable: outline plans 0 legal and 0 commercial section(s); an ordering constraint n |
| citation-entails-claim | PASS | 24/0/24 | 24 of 24 planned claims carry an assigned frozen source; 0 declared without one; 0 P3 claim(s) resolved INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE and are REMOVED from the |
| competitor | PASS | 24/0/24 | 24 source/link origins resolved against 10 blocked competitor domains and 4 recognised market-context domains |
| structure-and-link-liveness | PASS | 9/0/9 | 8 sections + 1 required elements; link-liveness sub-check not applicable: the outline plans zero outbound links (predicate `planned_links is non-empty |
source: outline-qa-log.json
4. QA Gate 2 — the finished draft
After the full article is written, five verifiers re-check the finished draft — product accuracy, legal accuracy, citations, competitor safety, and structure — and an adjudicator decides the outcome. In this zero-cost run the legal and citation checks are deterministic (exact-match against the sources), which is stronger than an AI opinion and needs no paid API.
| Verifier | Result | checked/failed/denom | Detail | From |
|---|
| product | PASS | 24/0/24 | tier T1a: 0 product-class claim(s) of 24 declared; product claims resolve to catalog/ssot/ssot.json | claims.json |
| legal | PASS | 2/0/3 | deterministic pool match: 0 SUPPORTED, 0 CONTRADICTED, 2 INSUFFICIENT, 1 HUMAN_REVIEW | legal-verify-receipt.json |
| citation | FAIL | 11/2/11 | 9/11 citation gates PASS; 10 sources / 24 placements / reuse 2.4 | render-receipt.json |
| competitor | PASS | 11/0/11 | 10 cited source host(s) + body scanned against 10 blocked competitor domain(s); hits=none | draft.md + competitor-allowlist.json |
| structure | FLAG | 25/18/25 | 7/25 structural elements present; 2484 rendered words vs 2500 floor (delivery-gate measure; draft body 2173w) | render-receipt.json + article.html (delivery-gate word count) |
Adjudicator: NEEDS-FIX — 3 descriptive-legal claim(s) flagged for optional human review (advisory): ['c-022', 'c-023', 'c-024']; 2484 rendered words below the 2500-word floor — needs a short sourced expansion; citation gate(s) flagged: ['C-4 concentration <=35%', 'C-6 tier mix (>=3 in T1-3, >=2 T4)']; 2 of 24 claim(s) carry no verdict: the deterministic checker settles legal claims only and the semantic verifiers were not run. Each is bound byte-exact to a frozen source at S4, which is why the article renders, but byte-exactness is not a semantic verdict
word floor: 2484 rendered words (delivery-gate measure; draft body 2173w) vs 2500 · source: stage-report-S5-S7.json + editorial-review.json
5. Claim-accuracy table — every claim, traced
This is the heart of the proof. Every checkable claim in the article is listed with: the single-source-of-truth it draws on (LEGAL-SSOT = the legal folder, PRODUCT-SSOT = the product catalogue, OEM-TECHNICAL = manufacturer spec sheets), the source's own words (“before”), the verdict, and how it was checked. “After” — our paraphrase — is the claim text itself in column 2.
| Claim / verdict | Our text (after) | Value | Single source of truth | Source's own words (before) | Method |
|---|
c-001 — | Cummins publishes the answer in its own specification table for the 6.7L Turbo Diesel, where the number of cylinders is listed as six for both the high-output and the standard-outp | 6.7 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-002 — | The specification table Cummins publishes for the 2019 chassis-cab version of the engine carries the same row. | 2019 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-10 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-003 — | Ram's introduction material for the engine states the layout outright and gives the displacement in cubic inches in the same sentence, describing the high-performance 408-cubi | 408 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-29 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-004 — | Later Ram material drops the long form and calls it the Cummins I-6 Turbo Diesel instead. | 6 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-27 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-005 — | The same abbreviation appears in Ram's material describing the torque milestone, which names the Cummins I-6 Turbo Diesel as the engine that reached it. | 6 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-30 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-006 — | Cummins publishes the bore as 107 mm for both ratings. | 107 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-007 — | The published stroke is 124 mm, again for both ratings. | 124 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-008 — | Ram's introduction material publishes the 5.9-litre engine's bore and stroke next to the 6.7's, featuring a 107mm bore by 124mm stroke versus 102mm bore by 120mm str | 5.9 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-29 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-009 — | Cummins publishes two different compression ratios for the same six-cylinder block, listing the high-output engine at 16.2 to 1 and the standard-output engine at 19 to 1. | 16.2 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-010 — | The high-output rating is published as exclusive to one truck and one transmission, offered exclusively in the RAM 3500 equipped with the Aisin transmission option. | 3500 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-011 — | Both ratings are published with the same fuel system in that table. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-012 — | Both are also published with the same aspiration. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-013 — | Cummins states that a Compacted Graphite Iron material for the block allows us to increase the cylinder pressure capability while reducing the overall weight by almost 60 lbs. | 60 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-10 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-014 — | The published wet weight of the assembled engine is listed as 1,070 lbs for the high-output rating and 1,071 lbs for the standard-output rating. | 1,070 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-015 — | Cummins describes the fuel-delivery system on the 2019 engine as including a new 29,000 psi fuel pump and fuel rail. | 2019 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-10 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-016 — | Ram's material records that in 1988, the Chrysler Group made a significant impact with the introduction of the Cummins 5.9-liter I-6 in heavy duty applications. | 1988, | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-29 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-017 — | Cummins dates the partnership from the 1989 model year, recording a 30-year partnership with RAM truck that started with the Cummins 5.9L Turbo Diesel in model year 1989. | 1989 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-07 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-018 — | The 6.7 was not a clean-sheet engine, and Ram published the overlap: the new engine retains more than 40 percent of its components from the 5.9-liter engine. | 6.7 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-29 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-019 — | Cummins traces the range of outputs from its 5.9-litre beginnings to the engines in current Ram pickups. | 5.9 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-06 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-020 — | One traditional inline-six job was published as removed on the 2019 engine, where Hydraulic Lash Adjusters completely eliminate the need to adjust the overhead. | 2019 | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-10 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-021 — | Cummins describes the current generation as a heavy-duty pickup engine built for serviceability alongside power and towing. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-08 | “” | Frozen source span (byte-exact) |
c-022 INSUFFICIENT | For an emissions-related part, the EPA states that CARB has issued an Executive Order that covers the same device or part on the same model vehicle on which the device or part was | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-19 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-023 HUMAN REVIEW | The EPA states that it will typically find a reasonable basis for the conduct where the emissions-related element of design has been exempted by the California Air Resources Board. | — | OEM-TECHNICAL oem-18 | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
c-024 INSUFFICIENT | CARB's own exemption procedures state that the Executive Officer shall deny the applicant's exemption request if the device will reduce the effectiveness of the emissions | — | LEGAL-SSOT (folder) s-authorities | “” | Deterministic exact-match vs legal pool |
source: claims.json (+ legal-verify-receipt.json for legal verdicts)
6. Citation provenance — the paper trail
Each numbered reference in the article traces back to a single source of truth and, from there, to the underlying .gov statute or manufacturer page. A source is linked once and reused by number thereafter (the hyperlink-once rule).
3
Legal claims → legal SSOT
0
Product claims → product SSOT
21
Technical claims → OEM specs
10
Distinct sources (1 legal / 9 OEM/KB / 0 product)
source: render-receipt.json + claims.json by_type
7. Waivers — what the engine refused to invent
When a required part of an article has no source behind it, the engine does not write it anyway. It records a waiver: the element, the reason, and exactly which sources were checked and found empty. This is the rule that would have prevented the August 2026 incident — an element with nothing behind it is declared missing, never filled in with something plausible. Below is every waiver on this article, so the gap is a decision you can see and overrule rather than a silence you would have to notice.
Element 3 — Key Takeawaysno key_takeaways in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:key_takeawaysmetadata.json:keyTakeaways
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 4 — Introductionno intro in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 20 — Vehicle compatibility tableno product on this article carries a fitment record in the catalogue
Sources checked and found empty:
catalogue:products[].fitment
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 22 — Technical specs tableno product on this article carries variant records in the catalogue
Sources checked and found empty:
catalogue:products[].variants
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 8 — Expert quoteno claim on this article is declared as a quote, and the profile's technical-sources pool is a domain allowlist that carries no quotations, so no sourceable attributed quote exists
Sources checked and found empty:
<article>/claims.json:type=quote<article>/claims.json:evidence.kind=quoteprofiles/<client>/technical-sources.json
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 9 — FAQno faq in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 16 — The Bottom Lineno bottom_line in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:bottom_line
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 24 — Internal link blockno internal_links in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:internal_links
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 27 — Named author biono author_bio/credentials in metadata (author in 2b)
Sources checked and found empty:
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 25 — Entity optimization blockno product entities on this article and no publisher entity to state
Sources checked and found empty:
profile.yaml:display_name<article>/callouts.json
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 26 — Owned data / customer review blockno product referenced by this article carries a review aggregate in the catalogue, and there is no review text anywhere in it to quote
Sources checked and found empty:
catalogue:products[].reviews.ratingcatalogue:products[].reviews.count
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 11 — AI block (GEO)the block reuses the Key Takeaways bullets and none exist (element 3 is itself waived)
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:key_takeawaysmetadata.json:keyTakeaways
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
Element 23 — Visible update datemetadata carries no date_modified, and the render clock is not a substitute for a recorded edit date
Sources checked and found empty:
metadata.json:date_modified
Decided 2026-08-14 17:01:09 UTC
source: waivers.json · cross-checked against the 13 waiver notice(s) rendered in article.html
8. Copied word-for-word? — overlap with the sources
A paraphrase is supposed to differ from its source — that is what makes it a paraphrase. This measures the opposite: how many of the article's words sit inside a run of 8 or more consecutive words that also appears, exactly, in one of the frozen sources the writer worked from. This is shown, never enforced. It cannot block or delay anything, because some overlap is correct — legal wording has to track the statute closely, and a model name or a torque figure has one right spelling. Read a high number as "go and look", not as "this is wrong".
9.0%
Words inside a copied run
22
Longest copied run (words)
Low — consistent with paraphrasing, not copying · flag threshold 30%, a review trigger rather than a limit — nothing is blocked at any value
The longest copied runs, and where each came from:
| Length | Source | The copied words |
|---|
| 22w | s-authorities | “the Executive Officer shall deny the applicant's exemption request if the device will reduce the effectiveness of the emissions control system.” |
| 21w | oem-10 | “material for the block allows us to increase the cylinder pressure capability while reducing the overall weight by almost 60 lbs.” |
| 21w | oem-29 | “in 1988, the Chrysler Group made a significant impact with the introduction of the Cummins 5.9-liter I-6 in heavy duty applications.” |
| 20w | oem-19 | “that covers the same device or part on the same model vehicle on which the device or part was installed.” |
| 19w | oem-07 | “a 30-year partnership with RAM truck that started with the Cummins 5.9L Turbo Diesel in model year 1989.
The” |
| 17w | oem-29 | “featuring a 107mm bore by 124mm stroke versus 102mm bore by 120mm stroke for the 5.9-liter engine.” |
| 15w | oem-29 | “the new engine retains more than 40 percent of its components from the 5.9-liter engine.” |
| 12w | oem-07 | “offered exclusively in the RAM 3500 equipped with the Aisin transmission option.” |
| 11w | oem-10 | “Hydraulic Lash Adjusters completely eliminate the need to adjust the overhead.” |
| 9w | oem-18 | “has been exempted by the California Air Resources Board.” |
| 9w | s-authorities | “CARB, Procedures for Exemption of Add-On and Modified Parts” |
| 8w | oem-19, s-usa-regs | “EPA, Enforcement Policy on Vehicle and Engine Tampering” |
Words copied, by source:
| Source | Words |
|---|
oem-29 | 53 words |
oem-10 | 32 words |
oem-07 | 31 words |
s-authorities | 31 words |
oem-19 | 28 words |
oem-18 | 9 words |
s-usa-regs | 8 words |
Read the draft with the copied runs highlighted — every highlight names the source it matches
# How Many Cylinders in a 6.7 Cummins? Six, in a Single Row
Six. All six sit in one straight line along the top of the block, which is what "inline-six" means and why the engine is long and narrow rather than short and wide.
That is the whole answer to the question. What follows is the manufacturer's own published detail behind it, because the interesting part is not the number — it is what six cylinders of that particular size and arrangement produce, and what they mean when the engine is in front of you with the hood open.
## Six cylinders, in a single row
There is no need to work this out from displacement or to count injectors. Cummins publishes the answer in its own specification table for the 6.7L Turbo Diesel, where the number of cylinders is listed as six for both the high-output and the standard-output rating.
Two ratings, one count. That matters, because the two ratings of this engine differ in several published respects and cylinder count is not one of them.
The specification table Cummins publishes for the 2019 chassis-cab version of the engine carries the same row. So the count is a property of the engine family rather than of one truck, one transmission or one output level.
## The layout, in the manufacturer's own words
Ram's introduction material for the engine states the layout outright and gives the displacement in cubic inches in the same sentence, describing the high-performance 408-cubic-inch inline-six intercooled turbo-diesel.
Two useful things in one line. The layout is named, and the displacement appears in the unit American truck buyers grew up with: 408 cubic inches is the same volume as 6.7 litres, written the other way round.
Later Ram material drops the long form and calls it the Cummins I-6 Turbo Diesel instead. The same abbreviation appears in Ram's material describing the torque milestone, which names the Cummins I-6 Turbo Diesel as the engine that reached it.
"I-6" and "inline-six" are the same specification written two ways — the I stands for inline and the 6 is the cylinder count. If you are reading a spec sheet, a press release and a service manual for the same truck, you will meet both forms and occasionally the word "straight-six" as well. All three describe one arrangement.
## Where the six cylinders come from arithmetically
Six cylinders on their own do not give you 6.7 litres. Two more published figures do that, and Cummins lists both.
Cummins publishes the bore as 107 mm for both ratings. The published stroke is 124 mm, again for both ratings.
Bore is how wide each cylinder is; stroke is how far the piston travels inside it. Multiply the area of one 107 mm circle by 124 mm of travel and you get the volume of one cylinder. Six of those is the displacement on the badge. Nothing about the number 6.7 is arbitrary — it is bore, stroke and cylinder count, and any two of those three plus the displacement will give you the third.
Notice the relationship between the two figures. The stroke, at 124 mm, is longer than the bore is wide. Engine people call that arrangement undersquare or long-stroke, and it is a deliberate choice for an engine whose job is pulling: a long stroke gives the expanding gas more leverage on the crankshaft, which is torque, and it does so at low engine speed.
Ram's introduction material publishes the 5.9-litre engine's bore and stroke next to the 6.7's, featuring a 107mm bore by 124mm stroke versus 102mm bore by 120mm stroke for the 5.9-liter engine.oem-29
Both dimensions grew, and the cylinder count did not. That is the shortest possible summary of how the 5.9 became the 6.7 — the same six holes, each one wider and deeper.
## Six cylinders, two very different ratings
Here is where the published table gets genuinely informative, and where "how many cylinders" stops being the useful question.
Cummins publishes two different compression ratios for the same six-cylinder block, listing the high-output engine at 16.2 to 1 and the standard-output engine at 19 to 1.
That is a substantial difference inside identical cylinder dimensions. Compression ratio is how much the piston squeezes the air before fuel is injected, and lowering it on the high-output engine is what allows more fuel and more boost without exceeding what the cylinder and its head gasket can hold. The high-output engine is not a bigger engine. It is the same six cylinders working to a different set of numbers.
Which truck you can have it in is published too. The high-output rating is published as exclusive to one truck and one transmission, offered exclusively in the RAM 3500 equipped with the Aisin transmission option.oem-07
So the output difference tracks the drivetrain behind the engine, not the engine's architecture. What the crankshaft can make and what the gearbox behind it can survive are two separate limits, and the rating is set by both.
Two things do not change between the ratings. Both ratings are published with the same fuel system in that table. Both are also published with the same aspiration.
One fuel system, one turbocharger arrangement, one cylinder count, two calibrations. If you have ever wondered why a standard-output truck and a high-output truck feel like relatives rather than different animals, that is why.
## What holds six cylinders of this size together
An inline-six of nearly seven litres puts six large combustion events in a row along a single crankshaft, and the structure carrying them is not incidental to how long the engine lasts.
Cummins states that a Compacted Graphite Iron material for the block allows us to increase the cylinder pressure capability while reducing the overall weight by almost 60 lbs.oem-10
Read that carefully, because it is two facts at once and both are about the block rather than the badge: a higher ceiling on what each cylinder can contain, and less iron doing the containing. Compacted graphite iron sits between ordinary grey cast iron and ductile iron in its behaviour, and the reason to choose it is stiffness per pound.
Even so, this is a heavy assembly. The published wet weight of the assembled engine is listed as 1,070 lbs for the high-output rating and 1,071 lbs for the standard-output rating.
Over half a ton of engine, before the transmission. That figure explains a lot about how a heavy-duty truck is built around it — front axle rating, spring rates, steering effort and where the weight sits relative to the front wheels are all downstream of it.
The fuel side scaled with the structure. Cummins describes the fuel-delivery system on the 2019 engine as including a new 29,000 psi fuel pump and fuel rail.
Common-rail pressures in that range are what allow a single injection event to be split into several precisely-timed ones, which is most of the reason a modern six-cylinder diesel is quieter and cleaner than the same layout was thirty years ago.
## The inline-six goes back to the 5.9
The layout is not a recent decision. Ram's material records that in 1988, the Chrysler Group made a significant impact with the introduction of the Cummins 5.9-liter I-6 in heavy duty applications.oem-29
Cummins dates the partnership from the 1989 model year, recording a 30-year partnership with RAM truck that started with the Cummins 5.9L Turbo Diesel in model year 1989.
Theoem-07 two dates are not in conflict: one is when the engine entered the application, the other is the model year the trucks were sold as. Either way, the count has been six since the beginning.
The 6.7 was not a clean-sheet engine, and Ram published the overlap: the new engine retains more than 40 percent of its components from the 5.9-liter engine.oem-29
Cummins traces the range of outputs from its 5.9-litre beginnings to the engines in current Ram pickups. The output has multiplied. The number of cylinders has not moved once.
## What six-in-a-row means when the engine is serviced
Cylinder count is not trivia in a service bay. It sets how many of several things you are dealing with.
Six cylinders in a line means one cylinder head, not two. One head gasket, one valve cover, one exhaust manifold run down one side, one camshaft, and a single row of injectors that can all be reached from above without lifting an intake manifold out of a valley first. Compare that with a V engine, where nearly every one of those becomes two, and half of them are buried.
The inline arrangement also cancels its own vibration in a way a V8 does not, because the firing events are evenly spaced and the reciprocating masses oppose each other in pairs. That is why heavy-duty diesels are so consistently inline-sixes: it is the layout that runs smoothly at low speed under load without needing a balance shaft to help it.
One traditional inline-six job was published as removed on the 2019 engine, where Hydraulic Lash Adjusters completely eliminate the need to adjust the overhead.oem-10 Setting valve lash on six cylinders was a scheduled job on older diesels of this layout, and a real reason people learned the firing order. On the current engine it is not on the list.
Cummins describes the current generation as a heavy-duty pickup engine built for serviceability alongside power and towing. Serviceability being named at all is worth noticing, because on an inline-six a great deal of it comes directly from the layout: everything that needs regular attention is on one of two long sides.
## If you are buying parts for this engine
Most people who look up the cylinder count are about to buy something — filters, a gasket set, injectors, or a part further out in the intake or exhaust. For anything in an emissions-related position, one rule decides whether the part is legal to fit to a road-registered truck, and it is worth knowing before the box arrives.
For an emissions-related part, the EPA states that CARB has issued an Executive Order that covers the same device or part on the same model vehicle on which the device or part was installed.oem-19 An Executive Order is therefore specific twice over: to the part, and to the vehicle it goes on. A number printed on a similar part for a different engine does not carry across.
The EPA states that it will typically find a reasonable basis for the conduct where the emissions-related element of design has been exempted by the California Air Resources Board.oem-18 That is the federal side of the same fact — an exemption issued in California is the recognised evidence that the part does not make emissions worse.
There is one category that can never obtain that exemption. CARB's own exemption procedures state that the Executive Officer shall deny the applicant's exemption request if the device will reduce the effectiveness of the emissions control system.s-authorities A part whose function is to reduce the effectiveness of an emissions control system sits outside the exemption route by definition, not merely awaiting approval.
## The short version
Six cylinders, in one row, 107 mm across and 124 mm deep, in a compacted graphite iron block that weighs over a thousand pounds wet. Two published output ratings that differ in compression and calibration and not in cylinder count. The same six-in-a-row layout the engine has had since the 5.9, and the same reason heavy-duty diesels keep using it.
---
## Sources
1. Cummins Inc., 6.7L Turbo Diesel (2021) engine specifications — https://www.cummins.com
2. Cummins Inc., 6.7L Turbo Diesel (2019) for Chassis Cab engine specifications — https://www.cummins.com
3. Cummins Inc., 6.7L Turbo Diesel Engine — https://www.cummins.com
4. Cummins Inc., Cummins-RAM History — https://www.cummins.com
5. Stellantis North America media newsroom, 6.7-litre Cummins introduction release — https://media.stellantisnorthamerica.com/newsrelease.do?id=6229&mid=97
6. Stellantis North America media newsroom, Ram Heavy Duty model-year press material — https://media.stellantisnorthamerica.com/newsrelease.do?id=21131
7. Stellantis North America media newsroom, Ram Heavy Duty model-year press material — https://media.stellantisnorthamerica.com/newsrelease.do?id=24053&mid=71
8. EPA, Tampering and Defeat Devices enforcement alert — https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/documents/tamperinganddefeatdevices-enfalert.pdf
9. EPA, Enforcement Policy on Vehicle and Engine Tamperingoem-19, s-usa-regs — https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/documents/epatamperingpolicy-enforcementpolicyonvehicleandenginetampering.pdf
10. CARB, Procedures for Exemption of Add-On and Modified Partss-authorities — https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/board/15day/ampts/proceduresfinal.pdf
source: lib/overlap over draft.md vs frozen/sources/*.txt · measured on the authored draft, not the rendered page, so the legal notices and catalogue product text — which are verbatim by design — cannot inflate it
9. Verdict
NEEDS FIX
3 descriptive-legal claim(s) flagged for optional human review (advisory): ['c-022', 'c-023', 'c-024']; 2484 rendered words below the 2500-word floor — needs a short sourced expansion; citation gate(s) flagged: ['C-4 concentration <=35%', 'C-6 tier mix (>=3 in T1-3, >=2 T4)']; 2 of 24 claim(s) carry no verdict: the deterministic checker settles legal claims only and the semantic verifiers were not run. Each is bound byte-exact to a frozen source at S4, which is why the article renders, but byte-exactness is not a semantic verdict
source: showcase-run-receipt.json · legal check: PASS · 2484 rendered words (draft body 2173w)